Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4 or Grok 3?

Claude Haiku 4 is cheaper for both input ($0.80/M tokens) and output ($4.00/M tokens), compared to Grok 3 at $3.00/$15.00 per million tokens.

Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4 or Grok 3?

Claude Haiku 4 is faster at 130 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 150ms, compared to Grok 3 at 80 tokens/sec and 300ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4 or Grok 3?

Claude Haiku 4 has a 200K token context window, which is larger Grok 3's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4 or Grok 3?

Grok 3 has a higher coding ELO of 1290 compared to Claude Haiku 4's 1195, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

Claude Haiku 4 vs Grok 3: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: Claude Haiku 4 vs Grok 3 — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Claude Haiku 4 is significantly cheaper at $0.80/$4.00 per million tokens vs $3.00/$15.00. Grok 3 is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1290 vs 1195. Claude Haiku 4 is faster at 130 tokens/sec vs 80 tokens/sec. Grok 3 ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1300 vs 1220. Claude Haiku 4 offers a larger 200K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Claude Haiku 4	Grok 3
Provider	Anthropic	xAI
Input Price / 1M tokens	$1.00	$3.00
Output Price / 1M tokens	$5.00	$15.00
Context Window	200K	200K
Max Output Tokens	8,192	8,192
Arena ELO	1,220	1,285
Coding ELO	1,195	1,280
TTFT (ms)	150	200
Tokens/sec	130	90
Multimodal	Yes	No
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	Yes	No

When to Use Claude Haiku 4

Choose Claude Haiku 4 when you need: very fast response times, 200k context window, affordable for anthropic quality, good instruction following. It excels at chatbots, classification, cost-sensitive, high-volume tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 200K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

Very fast response times
200K context window
Affordable for Anthropic quality
Good instruction following

Best for:

chatbotsclassificationcost-sensitivehigh-volume

When to Use Grok 3

Choose Grok 3 when you need: strong benchmark performance, good reasoning capabilities, vision and multimodal support, fast for its capability tier. It excels at general-purpose, reasoning, coding tasks.

Strengths:

Latest xAI model
Strong reasoning
Large context

Best for:

general-purposecodingreasoning

Claude Haiku 4 vs Grok 3: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons