Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for both input ($0.20/M tokens) and output ($0.60/M tokens), compared to Claude Sonnet 4 at $3.00/$15.00 per million tokens.

Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is faster at 90 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 250ms, compared to Claude Sonnet 4 at 78 tokens/sec and 320ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick has a 1049K token context window, which is larger Claude Sonnet 4's 200K context window.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude Sonnet 4 has a higher coding ELO of 1305 compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1280, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: Claude Sonnet 4 vs Llama 4 Maverick — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Aug 3, 2026By LLMversusUpdated August 8, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Maverick is significantly cheaper at $0.20/$0.60 per million tokens vs $3.00/$15.00. Claude Sonnet 4 is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1305 vs 1280. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 200K.

Updated: August 3, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Claude Sonnet 4	Llama 4 Maverick
Provider	Anthropic	Meta
Input Price / 1M tokens	$3.00	$0.200
Output Price / 1M tokens	$15.00	$0.800
Context Window	200K	1.048576M
Max Output Tokens	64,000	32,768
Arena ELO	1,472	1,290
Coding ELO	1,472	1,280
TTFT (ms)	320	250
Tokens/sec	78	90
Multimodal	Yes	Yes
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	Yes	Yes

When to Use Claude Sonnet 4

Choose Claude Sonnet 4 when you need: best-in-class coding performance, 200k context window, excellent instruction following. It excels at coding, analysis, long-context, agents tasks.

Strengths:

Best-in-class coding performance
200K context window
Excellent instruction following

Best for:

codinganalysislong-contextagents

When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

Open-source model with strong performance
Very affordable via hosted providers
1M context window
Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons