LV
LLMversus

Codestral 22B vs Phi-3.5 Mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 8, 2026

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Codestral 22B and Phi-3.5 Mini across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: April 8, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCodestral 22BPhi-3.5 Mini
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.200$0.130
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$0.520
Context Window
256K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELON/A1,160
Coding ELO
1,250
1,165
TTFT (ms)
150
150
Tokens/sec
100
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Codestral 22B

Codestral 22B excels at coding, long-context tasks.

Strengths:

  • Best-in-class code generation
  • Huge context for repos
  • Function calling strength

Best for:

codinglong-context
When to Use Phi-3.5 Mini

Phi-3.5 Mini excels at cost-effective, fast-inference tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very cheap
  • Fast
  • Large context

Best for:

cost-effectivefast-inference

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Phi-3.5 MiniClaude Opus 4 vs Codestral 22BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-3.5 MiniCodestral 22B vs Gemini 2 5 ProO3 vs Phi-3.5 MiniCodestral 22B vs O3Deepseek R1 vs Phi-3.5 MiniCodestral 22B vs Deepseek R1O1 vs Phi-3.5 MiniCodestral 22B vs O1Phi-3.5 Mini vs Qwen 3 235bCodestral 22B vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs Phi-3.5 MiniCodestral 22B vs Gemini Exp 1206Gpt 4 5 vs Phi-3.5 MiniCodestral 22B vs Gpt 4 5Groq Deepseek R1 vs Phi-3.5 MiniCodestral 22B vs Groq Deepseek R1Llama 4 Maverick vs Phi-3.5 MiniCodestral 22B vs Llama 4 Maverick