LLMversus

Codestral 22B vs Phi-4: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Codestral 22B and Phi-4 across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCodestral 22BPhi-4
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.300$0.070
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.900$0.140
Context Window
256K
16.384K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELON/A1,150
Coding ELO
1,250
1,130
TTFT (ms)
150
100
Tokens/sec
100
160
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesNo
VisionNoNo
When to Use Codestral 22B

Codestral 22B excels at coding, long-context tasks.

Strengths:

  • Best-in-class code generation
  • Huge context for repos
  • Function calling strength

Best for:

codinglong-context
When to Use Phi-4

Phi-4 excels at cost-sensitive, edge-deployment, math, lightweight-tasks tasks.

Strengths:

  • Ultra-low cost for a capable model
  • Strong math for its size (14B params)
  • Very fast inference
  • Can run on consumer hardware

Best for:

cost-sensitiveedge-deploymentmathlightweight-tasks

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Phi-4Claude Opus 4 vs Codestral 22BClaude Sonnet 4 vs Phi-4Claude Sonnet 4 vs Codestral 22BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-4Codestral 22B vs Gemini 2 5 ProClaude Haiku 4 vs Phi-4Claude Haiku 4 vs Codestral 22BDeepseek R1 vs Phi-4Codestral 22B vs Deepseek R1Phi-4 vs Qwen 2 5 MaxCodestral 22B vs Qwen 2 5 MaxGemini 2 0 Flash vs Phi-4Codestral 22B vs Gemini 2 0 FlashDeepseek V3 vs Phi-4Codestral 22B vs Deepseek V3O3 Mini vs Phi-4Codestral 22B vs O3 MiniO3 vs Phi-4Codestral 22B vs O3