LLMversus

Command A vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Command A and Llama 3.2 90B Vision across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand ALlama 3.2 90B Vision
ProviderCohereMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.50$0.900
Output Price / 1M tokens$10.00$0.900
Context Window
256K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,240
1,210
Coding ELO1,230N/A
TTFT (ms)
150
150
Tokens/sec
100
100
MultimodalNoYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoYes
When to Use Command A

Command A excels at general-purpose, long-context tasks.

Strengths:

  • Large context window
  • Good reasoning
  • Function calling strength

Best for:

general-purposelong-context
When to Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision

Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at multimodal, vision, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Strong vision capabilities
  • Multimodal understanding
  • Competitive pricing

Best for:

multimodalvisiongeneral-purpose

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Command AClaude Opus 4 vs Llama 3.2 90B VisionClaude Sonnet 4 vs Command AClaude Sonnet 4 vs Llama 3.2 90B VisionCommand A vs Gemini 2 5 ProGemini 2 5 Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B VisionClaude Haiku 4 vs Command AClaude Haiku 4 vs Llama 3.2 90B VisionCommand A vs Deepseek R1Deepseek R1 vs Llama 3.2 90B VisionCommand A vs Qwen 2 5 MaxLlama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2 5 MaxCommand A vs Gemini 2 0 FlashGemini 2 0 Flash vs Llama 3.2 90B VisionCommand A vs Deepseek V3Deepseek V3 vs Llama 3.2 90B VisionCommand A vs O3 MiniLlama 3.2 90B Vision vs O3 MiniCommand A vs O3Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs O3