DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-4 1.5-mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

DeepSeek R1 is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1330 vs 1230. GPT-4.1 Mini is faster at 115 tokens/sec vs 45 tokens/sec. DeepSeek R1 ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1310 vs 1240. GPT-4.1 Mini offers a larger 1048K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek R1GPT-4 1.5-mini
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.500$0.400
Output Price / 1M tokens$2.15$1.60
Context Window
128K
128K
Max Output Tokens
8,192
4,096
Arena ELO
1,310
1,180
Coding ELO
1,330
1,200
TTFT (ms)
1,800
140
Tokens/sec
45
120
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingNoYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use DeepSeek R1

Choose DeepSeek R1 when you need: excellent reasoning at a fraction of o3's cost, open-source and self-hostable, top-tier math performance, very competitive with proprietary reasoning models. It excels at reasoning, math, coding, science tasks.

Strengths:

  • Excellent reasoning at a fraction of o3's cost
  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Top-tier math performance
  • Very competitive with proprietary reasoning models

Best for:

reasoningmathcodingscience
When to Use GPT-4 1.5-mini

Choose GPT-4.1 Mini when you need: 1m token context window at low cost, great balance of speed and quality, strong coding for a mini model, affordable for high-volume use. It excels at chatbots, long-context, cost-sensitive tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1048K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Affordable
  • Fast
  • Large context

Best for:

cost-effectivegeneral-purpose

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons