LLMversus

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Phi-4: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Gemini 1.5 Pro and Phi-4 across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGemini 1.5 ProPhi-4
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Input Price / 1M tokens$1.25$0.070
Output Price / 1M tokens$5.00$0.140
Context Window
2M
16.384K
Max Output Tokens
8,192
4,096
Arena ELO
1,230
1,150
Coding ELON/A1,130
TTFT (ms)
150
100
Tokens/sec
100
160
MultimodalYesNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesNo
VisionYesNo
When to Use Gemini 1.5 Pro

Gemini 1.5 Pro excels at multimodal, long-context, vision tasks.

Strengths:

  • Largest context window (2M)
  • Strong multimodal
  • Video understanding

Best for:

multimodallong-contextvision
When to Use Phi-4

Phi-4 excels at cost-sensitive, edge-deployment, math, lightweight-tasks tasks.

Strengths:

  • Ultra-low cost for a capable model
  • Strong math for its size (14B params)
  • Very fast inference
  • Can run on consumer hardware

Best for:

cost-sensitiveedge-deploymentmathlightweight-tasks

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 1.5 ProClaude Opus 4 vs Phi-4Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 1.5 ProClaude Sonnet 4 vs Phi-4Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemini 2 5 ProGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-4Claude Haiku 4 vs Gemini 1.5 ProClaude Haiku 4 vs Phi-4Deepseek R1 vs Gemini 1.5 ProDeepseek R1 vs Phi-4Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Qwen 2 5 MaxPhi-4 vs Qwen 2 5 MaxGemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemini 2 0 FlashGemini 2 0 Flash vs Phi-4Deepseek V3 vs Gemini 1.5 ProDeepseek V3 vs Phi-4Gemini 1.5 Pro vs O3 MiniO3 Mini vs Phi-4Gemini 1.5 Pro vs O3O3 vs Phi-4