Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4 1: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Gemini 2.0 Flash is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.40 per million tokens vs $2.00/$8.00. GPT-4.1 is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1320 vs 1240. Gemini 2.0 Flash is faster at 160 tokens/sec vs 88 tokens/sec. GPT-4.1 ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1260.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 FlashGPT-4 1
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.100$2.00
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.400$8.00
Context Window
1.048576M
8.192K
Max Output Tokens
8,192
2,048
Arena ELO
1,260
1,200
Coding ELO
1,240
1,210
TTFT (ms)
120
160
Tokens/sec
160
85
MultimodalYesNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesNo
When to Use Gemini 2.0 Flash

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash when you need: extremely fast inference, 1m context window at very low cost, strong multimodal support, great for real-time applications. It excels at chatbots, high-volume, cost-sensitive, multimodal tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Extremely fast inference
  • 1M context window at very low cost
  • Strong multimodal support
  • Great for real-time applications

Best for:

chatbotshigh-volumecost-sensitivemultimodal
When to Use GPT-4 1

Choose GPT-4.1 when you need: 1m token context window, excellent coding performance, strong instruction following, competitive pricing for its capability. It excels at coding, long-context, agents, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Good quality
  • Affordable
  • Reliable

Best for:

general-purposecoding

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons