Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4 1.5-nano: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)
⚡ Quick Answer
Gemini 2.0 Flash is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1240 vs 1150. Gemini 2.0 Flash ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1260 vs 1180.
Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4 1.5-nano |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.100 | $0.100 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $0.400 | $0.400 |
| Context Window | 1.048576M | 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | 8,192 | 4,096 |
| Arena ELO | 1,260 | 1,150 |
| Coding ELO | 1,240 | 1,160 |
| TTFT (ms) | 120 | 120 |
| Tokens/sec | 160 | 150 |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| JSON Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 2.0 FlashClaude Opus 4 vs GPT-4 1.5-nanoGemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2 5 ProGemini 2 5 Pro vs GPT-4 1.5-nanoGemini 2.0 Flash vs O3GPT-4 1.5-nano vs O3Deepseek R1 vs Gemini 2.0 FlashDeepseek R1 vs GPT-4 1.5-nanoGemini 2.0 Flash vs O1GPT-4 1.5-nano vs O1Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Qwen 3 235bGPT-4 1.5-nano vs Qwen 3 235bGemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini Exp 1206Gemini Exp 1206 vs GPT-4 1.5-nanoGemini 2.0 Flash vs Gpt 4 5GPT-4 1.5-nano vs Gpt 4 5Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Groq Deepseek R1GPT-4 1.5-nano vs Groq Deepseek R1Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 4 MaverickGPT-4 1.5-nano vs Llama 4 Maverick