LV
LLMversus

InternLM 2.5 20B vs Qwen 2.5 72B: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 8, 2026

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare InternLM 2.5 20B and Qwen 2.5 72B across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: April 8, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureInternLM 2.5 20BQwen 2.5 72B
ProviderShanghai AI LabAlibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.180$0.400
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.180$1.20
Context Window
32K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,155
1,230
Coding ELO
1,150
1,210
TTFT (ms)
150
150
Tokens/sec
100
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use InternLM 2.5 20B

InternLM 2.5 20B excels at cost-effective, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very affordable
  • Good instruction following
  • Fast

Best for:

cost-effectivegeneral-purpose
When to Use Qwen 2.5 72B

Qwen 2.5 72B excels at coding, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Strong code generation
  • Competitive pricing
  • Large context

Best for:

codinggeneral-purpose

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen 2.5 72BClaude Opus 4 vs InternLM 2.5 20BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Qwen 2.5 72BGemini 2 5 Pro vs InternLM 2.5 20BO3 vs Qwen 2.5 72BInternLM 2.5 20B vs O3Deepseek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 72BDeepseek R1 vs InternLM 2.5 20BO1 vs Qwen 2.5 72BInternLM 2.5 20B vs O1Qwen 2.5 72B vs Qwen 3 235bInternLM 2.5 20B vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs Qwen 2.5 72BGemini Exp 1206 vs InternLM 2.5 20BGpt 4 5 vs Qwen 2.5 72BGpt 4 5 vs InternLM 2.5 20BGroq Deepseek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 72BGroq Deepseek R1 vs InternLM 2.5 20BLlama 4 Maverick vs Qwen 2.5 72BInternLM 2.5 20B vs Llama 4 Maverick