LV
LLMversus

Llama 3.1 70B vs Phi-4: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 8, 2026

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Llama 3.1 70B and Phi-4 across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: April 8, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 70BPhi-4
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.350$0.065
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.400$0.140
Context Window
128K
16.384K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,195
1,150
Coding ELON/A1,130
TTFT (ms)
150
100
Tokens/sec
100
160
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesNo
VisionNoNo
When to Use Llama 3.1 70B

Llama 3.1 70B excels at coding, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Good balance of speed and quality
  • Large context window
  • Strong instruction following

Best for:

codinggeneral-purpose
When to Use Phi-4

Phi-4 excels at cost-sensitive, edge-deployment, math, lightweight-tasks tasks.

Strengths:

  • Ultra-low cost for a capable model
  • Strong math for its size (14B params)
  • Very fast inference
  • Can run on consumer hardware

Best for:

cost-sensitiveedge-deploymentmathlightweight-tasks

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Llama 3.1 70BClaude Opus 4 vs Phi-4Gemini 2 5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 70BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-4Llama 3.1 70B vs O3O3 vs Phi-4Deepseek R1 vs Llama 3.1 70BDeepseek R1 vs Phi-4Llama 3.1 70B vs O1O1 vs Phi-4Llama 3.1 70B vs Qwen 3 235bPhi-4 vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs Llama 3.1 70BGemini Exp 1206 vs Phi-4Gpt 4 5 vs Llama 3.1 70BGpt 4 5 vs Phi-4Groq Deepseek R1 vs Llama 3.1 70BGroq Deepseek R1 vs Phi-4Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Maverick vs Phi-4