LV
LLMversus

Mistral Nemo 12B vs Phi-4: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 8, 2026

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Mistral Nemo 12B and Phi-4 across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: April 8, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureMistral Nemo 12BPhi-4
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.150$0.065
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.150$0.140
Context Window
128K
16.384K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,140
1,150
Coding ELON/A1,130
TTFT (ms)
150
100
Tokens/sec
100
160
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesNo
VisionNoNo
When to Use Mistral Nemo 12B

Mistral Nemo 12B excels at cost-effective, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Excellent value
  • Large context
  • Fast inference

Best for:

cost-effectivegeneral-purpose
When to Use Phi-4

Phi-4 excels at cost-sensitive, edge-deployment, math, lightweight-tasks tasks.

Strengths:

  • Ultra-low cost for a capable model
  • Strong math for its size (14B params)
  • Very fast inference
  • Can run on consumer hardware

Best for:

cost-sensitiveedge-deploymentmathlightweight-tasks

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Phi-4Claude Opus 4 vs Mistral Nemo 12BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-4Gemini 2 5 Pro vs Mistral Nemo 12BO3 vs Phi-4Mistral Nemo 12B vs O3Deepseek R1 vs Phi-4Deepseek R1 vs Mistral Nemo 12BO1 vs Phi-4Mistral Nemo 12B vs O1Phi-4 vs Qwen 3 235bMistral Nemo 12B vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs Phi-4Gemini Exp 1206 vs Mistral Nemo 12BGpt 4 5 vs Phi-4Gpt 4 5 vs Mistral Nemo 12BGroq Deepseek R1 vs Phi-4Groq Deepseek R1 vs Mistral Nemo 12BLlama 4 Maverick vs Phi-4Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Nemo 12B