LLMversus

Phi-3.5 Mini vs Pixtral Large: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Phi-3.5 Mini and Pixtral Large across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeaturePhi-3.5 MiniPixtral Large
ProviderMicrosoftMistral AI
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.130$2.00
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.520$6.00
Context Window
128K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,160
1,230
Coding ELO1,165N/A
TTFT (ms)
150
150
Tokens/sec
100
100
MultimodalNoYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoYes
When to Use Phi-3.5 Mini

Phi-3.5 Mini excels at cost-effective, fast-inference tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very cheap
  • Fast
  • Large context

Best for:

cost-effectivefast-inference
When to Use Pixtral Large

Pixtral Large excels at multimodal, vision, function-calling tasks.

Strengths:

  • Strong vision understanding
  • Multimodal capabilities
  • Good function calling

Best for:

multimodalvisionfunction-calling

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Pixtral LargeClaude Opus 4 vs Phi-3.5 MiniClaude Sonnet 4 vs Pixtral LargeClaude Sonnet 4 vs Phi-3.5 MiniGemini 2 5 Pro vs Pixtral LargeGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-3.5 MiniClaude Haiku 4 vs Pixtral LargeClaude Haiku 4 vs Phi-3.5 MiniDeepseek R1 vs Pixtral LargeDeepseek R1 vs Phi-3.5 MiniPixtral Large vs Qwen 2 5 MaxPhi-3.5 Mini vs Qwen 2 5 MaxGemini 2 0 Flash vs Pixtral LargeGemini 2 0 Flash vs Phi-3.5 MiniDeepseek V3 vs Pixtral LargeDeepseek V3 vs Phi-3.5 MiniO3 Mini vs Pixtral LargeO3 Mini vs Phi-3.5 MiniO3 vs Pixtral LargeO3 vs Phi-3.5 Mini