LV
LLMversus

Phi-3.5 Mini vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 8, 2026

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Phi-3.5 Mini and Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: April 8, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeaturePhi-3.5 MiniQwen 2.5 Coder 32B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.130$0.200
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.520$0.600
Context Window
128K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO1,160N/A
Coding ELO
1,165
1,290
TTFT (ms)
150
150
Tokens/sec
100
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Phi-3.5 Mini

Phi-3.5 Mini excels at cost-effective, fast-inference tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very cheap
  • Fast
  • Large context

Best for:

cost-effectivefast-inference
When to Use Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B excels at coding, function-calling tasks.

Strengths:

  • Best code generation
  • Large context
  • Efficient pricing

Best for:

codingfunction-calling

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Phi-3.5 MiniClaude Opus 4 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-3.5 MiniGemini 2 5 Pro vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BO3 vs Phi-3.5 MiniO3 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BDeepseek R1 vs Phi-3.5 MiniDeepseek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BO1 vs Phi-3.5 MiniO1 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BPhi-3.5 Mini vs Qwen 3 235bQwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs Phi-3.5 MiniGemini Exp 1206 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BGpt 4 5 vs Phi-3.5 MiniGpt 4 5 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BGroq Deepseek R1 vs Phi-3.5 MiniGroq Deepseek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BLlama 4 Maverick vs Phi-3.5 MiniLlama 4 Maverick vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B