LV
LLMversus

Phi-3.5 MoE vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 8, 2026

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Phi-3.5 MoE and Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: April 8, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeaturePhi-3.5 MoEQwen 2.5 Coder 32B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.170$0.200
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.680$0.600
Context Window
128K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO1,195N/A
Coding ELO
1,190
1,290
TTFT (ms)
150
150
Tokens/sec
100
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Phi-3.5 MoE

Phi-3.5 MoE excels at general-purpose, cost-effective tasks.

Strengths:

  • Mixture of experts
  • Efficient
  • Balanced performance

Best for:

general-purposecost-effective
When to Use Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B excels at coding, function-calling tasks.

Strengths:

  • Best code generation
  • Large context
  • Efficient pricing

Best for:

codingfunction-calling

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Phi-3.5 MoEClaude Opus 4 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-3.5 MoEGemini 2 5 Pro vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BO3 vs Phi-3.5 MoEO3 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BDeepseek R1 vs Phi-3.5 MoEDeepseek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BO1 vs Phi-3.5 MoEO1 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BPhi-3.5 MoE vs Qwen 3 235bQwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs Phi-3.5 MoEGemini Exp 1206 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BGpt 4 5 vs Phi-3.5 MoEGpt 4 5 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BGroq Deepseek R1 vs Phi-3.5 MoEGroq Deepseek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BLlama 4 Maverick vs Phi-3.5 MoELlama 4 Maverick vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B