LLMversus

Phi-4 vs Qwen 2.5 72B: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Phi-4 and Qwen 2.5 72B across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeaturePhi-4Qwen 2.5 72B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.070$0.360
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.140$0.400
Context Window
16.384K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,150
1,230
Coding ELO
1,130
1,210
TTFT (ms)
100
150
Tokens/sec
160
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingNoYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Phi-4

Phi-4 excels at cost-sensitive, edge-deployment, math, lightweight-tasks tasks.

Strengths:

  • Ultra-low cost for a capable model
  • Strong math for its size (14B params)
  • Very fast inference
  • Can run on consumer hardware

Best for:

cost-sensitiveedge-deploymentmathlightweight-tasks
When to Use Qwen 2.5 72B

Qwen 2.5 72B excels at coding, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Strong code generation
  • Competitive pricing
  • Large context

Best for:

codinggeneral-purpose

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen 2.5 72BClaude Opus 4 vs Phi-4Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen 2.5 72BClaude Sonnet 4 vs Phi-4Gemini 2 5 Pro vs Qwen 2.5 72BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-4Claude Haiku 4 vs Qwen 2.5 72BClaude Haiku 4 vs Phi-4Deepseek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 72BDeepseek R1 vs Phi-4Qwen 2.5 72B vs Qwen 2 5 MaxPhi-4 vs Qwen 2 5 MaxGemini 2 0 Flash vs Qwen 2.5 72BGemini 2 0 Flash vs Phi-4Deepseek V3 vs Qwen 2.5 72BDeepseek V3 vs Phi-4O3 Mini vs Qwen 2.5 72BO3 Mini vs Phi-4O3 vs Qwen 2.5 72BO3 vs Phi-4