LV
LLMversus

Phi-4 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 8, 2026

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Phi-4 and Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: April 8, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeaturePhi-4Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.065$0.200
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.140$0.600
Context Window
16.384K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO1,150N/A
Coding ELO
1,130
1,290
TTFT (ms)
100
150
Tokens/sec
160
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingNoYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Phi-4

Phi-4 excels at cost-sensitive, edge-deployment, math, lightweight-tasks tasks.

Strengths:

  • Ultra-low cost for a capable model
  • Strong math for its size (14B params)
  • Very fast inference
  • Can run on consumer hardware

Best for:

cost-sensitiveedge-deploymentmathlightweight-tasks
When to Use Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B excels at coding, function-calling tasks.

Strengths:

  • Best code generation
  • Large context
  • Efficient pricing

Best for:

codingfunction-calling

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Phi-4Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-4Gemini 2 5 Pro vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BO3 vs Phi-4O3 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BDeepseek R1 vs Phi-4Deepseek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BO1 vs Phi-4O1 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BPhi-4 vs Qwen 3 235bQwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs Phi-4Gemini Exp 1206 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BGpt 4 5 vs Phi-4Gpt 4 5 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BGroq Deepseek R1 vs Phi-4Groq Deepseek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BLlama 4 Maverick vs Phi-4Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B