LLMversus

Phi-4 vs QwQ 32B: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Phi-4 and QwQ 32B across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeaturePhi-4QwQ 32B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.070$0.150
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.140$0.580
Context Window
16.384K
32K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
8,192
Arena ELO
1,150
1,260
Coding ELO
1,130
1,250
TTFT (ms)
100
150
Tokens/sec
160
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingNoYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Phi-4

Phi-4 excels at cost-sensitive, edge-deployment, math, lightweight-tasks tasks.

Strengths:

  • Ultra-low cost for a capable model
  • Strong math for its size (14B params)
  • Very fast inference
  • Can run on consumer hardware

Best for:

cost-sensitiveedge-deploymentmathlightweight-tasks
When to Use QwQ 32B

QwQ 32B excels at reasoning, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Strong reasoning capabilities
  • Good math performance
  • Affordable

Best for:

reasoninggeneral-purpose

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs QwQ 32BClaude Opus 4 vs Phi-4Claude Sonnet 4 vs QwQ 32BClaude Sonnet 4 vs Phi-4Gemini 2 5 Pro vs QwQ 32BGemini 2 5 Pro vs Phi-4Claude Haiku 4 vs QwQ 32BClaude Haiku 4 vs Phi-4Deepseek R1 vs QwQ 32BDeepseek R1 vs Phi-4Qwen 2 5 Max vs QwQ 32BPhi-4 vs Qwen 2 5 MaxGemini 2 0 Flash vs QwQ 32BGemini 2 0 Flash vs Phi-4Deepseek V3 vs QwQ 32BDeepseek V3 vs Phi-4O3 Mini vs QwQ 32BO3 Mini vs Phi-4O3 vs QwQ 32BO3 vs Phi-4