Cody vs Supermaven (2026)

A detailed comparison of Cody and Supermaven covering features, pricing, platform support, and more.

Verdict

Both Cody and Supermaven are strong options. Cody stands out for excellent codebase understanding via sourcegraph, while Supermaven excels at fastest code completion on the market. Your choice depends on your team's workflow and priorities.

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodySupermaven
Code autocompleteYesNo
Codebase-aware chatYesNo
Code search integrationYesNo
Multi-repo contextYesNo
Custom commandsYesNo
Sourcegraph integrationYesNo
Ultra-fast code completionNoYes
1M token context windowNoYes
VS Code and JetBrains supportNoYes
Chat interfaceNoYes
Inline suggestionsNoYes
Multi-language supportNoYes

Pricing Comparison

DetailCodySupermaven
Free TierYesYes
Free Tier DetailsFree for individuals with unlimited autocomplete and limited chatFree tier with inline completions
Starting PriceFreeFree
Plan 1Pro: $9/monthPro: $10/month
Plan 2Enterprise: $19/month

Pros & Cons

Cody

Strengths

  • +Excellent codebase understanding via Sourcegraph
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Multi-repo context awareness
  • +Works with multiple editors

Limitations

  • -Less popular than Copilot/Cursor
  • -Best features require Sourcegraph
  • -Autocomplete less refined than competitors

Platforms

macwindowslinux
Supermaven

Strengths

  • +Fastest code completion on the market
  • +1M token context for better suggestions
  • +Very affordable Pro tier
  • +Low latency inline suggestions

Limitations

  • -Smaller feature set than Cursor/Copilot
  • -No multi-file editing agent
  • -Less mature product

Platforms

macwindowslinux

Related Tool Comparisons