Claude Haiku 4 vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.30 per million tokens vs $0.80/$4.00. Llama 4 Scout is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1230 vs 1195. Llama 4 Scout ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1250 vs 1220. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 200K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureClaude Haiku 4Llama 4 Scout
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$1.00$0.080
Output Price / 1M tokens$5.00$0.300
Context Window200K10.48576M
Max Output Tokens8,19232,768
Arena ELO1,2201,250
Coding ELO1,1951,230
TTFT (ms)150200
Tokens/sec130110
MultimodalYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesYes
When to Use Claude Haiku 4

Choose Claude Haiku 4 when you need: very fast response times, 200k context window, affordable for anthropic quality, good instruction following. It excels at chatbots, classification, cost-sensitive, high-volume tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very fast response times
  • 200K context window
  • Affordable for Anthropic quality
  • Good instruction following

Best for:

chatbotsclassificationcost-sensitivehigh-volume
When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • 10M token context window
  • Very affordable
  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons