LLMversus

Command R+ vs GPT-4o: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Aug 10, 2026By LLMversusUpdated August 11, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

GPT-4o is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1265 vs 1160. GPT-4o is faster at 95 tokens/sec vs 65 tokens/sec. GPT-4o ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1260 vs 1200.

Updated: August 10, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand R+GPT-4o
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.50$2.50
Output Price / 1M tokens$10.00$10.00
Context Window
128K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
16,384
Arena ELO
1,200
1,162
Coding ELO
1,160
1,162
TTFT (ms)
350
230
Tokens/sec
65
95
MultimodalNoYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoYes
When to Use Command R+

Choose Command R+ when you need: best-in-class rag capabilities, excellent citation and grounding, strong multilingual support, enterprise-focused features. It excels at rag, enterprise, multilingual, search tasks.

Strengths:

  • Best-in-class RAG capabilities
  • Excellent citation and grounding
  • Strong multilingual support
  • Enterprise-focused features

Best for:

ragenterprisemultilingualsearch
When to Use GPT-4o

Choose GPT-4o when you need: fast response times, strong multimodal capabilities, code execution support. It excels at general-purpose, multimodal, function-calling tasks.

Strengths:

  • Fast response times
  • Strong multimodal capabilities
  • Code execution support

Best for:

general-purposemultimodalfunction-calling

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Command R+Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4oClaude Sonnet 4 vs Command R+Claude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-4oCommand R+ vs Gemini 2 5 ProGemini 2 5 Pro vs GPT-4oClaude Haiku 4 vs Command R+Claude Haiku 4 vs GPT-4oCommand R+ vs Deepseek R1Deepseek R1 vs GPT-4oCommand R+ vs Qwen 2 5 MaxGPT-4o vs Qwen 2 5 MaxCommand R+ vs Gemini 2 0 FlashGemini 2 0 Flash vs GPT-4oCommand R+ vs Deepseek V3Deepseek V3 vs GPT-4oCommand R+ vs O3 MiniGPT-4o vs O3 MiniCommand R+ vs O3GPT-4o vs O3