Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Qwen 2.5 Max?

Qwen 2.5 Max is cheaper for both input ($0.16/M tokens) and output ($0.64/M tokens), compared to GPT-4o at $2.50/$10.00 per million tokens.

Which is faster, GPT-4o or Qwen 2.5 Max?

GPT-4o is faster at 95 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 230ms, compared to Qwen 2.5 Max at 80 tokens/sec and 240ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, GPT-4o or Qwen 2.5 Max?

GPT-4o has a 128K token context window, which is equal to Qwen 2.5 Max's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, GPT-4o or Qwen 2.5 Max?

GPT-4o has a higher coding ELO of 1265 compared to Qwen 2.5 Max's 1250, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

GPT-4o vs Qwen 2.5 Max: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: GPT-4o vs Qwen 2.5 Max — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Aug 3, 2026By LLMversusUpdated August 8, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Qwen 2.5 Max is significantly cheaper at $0.16/$0.64 per million tokens vs $2.50/$10.00.

Updated: August 3, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	GPT-4o	Qwen 2.5 Max
Provider	OpenAI	Alibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens	$2.50	$0.160
Output Price / 1M tokens	$10.00	$0.640
Context Window	128K	128K
Max Output Tokens	16,384	8,192
Arena ELO	1,346	1,374
Coding ELO	1,346	1,374
TTFT (ms)	230	240
Tokens/sec	95	80
Multimodal	Yes	No
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	Yes	No

When to Use GPT-4o

Choose GPT-4o when you need: fast response times, strong multimodal capabilities, code execution support. It excels at general-purpose, multimodal, function-calling tasks.

Strengths:

Fast response times
Strong multimodal capabilities
Code execution support

Best for:

general-purposemultimodalfunction-calling

When to Use Qwen 2.5 Max

Choose Qwen 2.5 Max when you need: extremely competitive pricing, strong coding and general capabilities, open-source model available, good multilingual support including chinese. It excels at coding, general-purpose, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two.

Strengths:

Extremely competitive pricing
Strong coding and general capabilities
Open-source model available
Good multilingual support including Chinese

Best for:

codinggeneral-purposecost-sensitiveopen-source

GPT-4o vs Qwen 2.5 Max: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons