Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen 2.5 Max?

Qwen 2.5 Max has cheaper input tokens ($0.16/M), while Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper output tokens ($0.60/M). The best value depends on your input-to-output ratio.

Which is faster, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen 2.5 Max?

Llama 4 Maverick is faster at 90 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 250ms, compared to Qwen 2.5 Max at 80 tokens/sec and 240ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen 2.5 Max?

Llama 4 Maverick has a 1049K token context window, which is larger Qwen 2.5 Max's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen 2.5 Max?

Llama 4 Maverick has a higher coding ELO of 1280 compared to Qwen 2.5 Max's 1250, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen 2.5 Max: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen 2.5 Max — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1250. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1260. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Llama 4 Maverick	Qwen 2.5 Max
Provider	Meta	Alibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.150	$0.160
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.600	$0.640
Context Window	1.048576M	128K
Max Output Tokens	32,768	8,192
Arena ELO	1,290	1,260
Coding ELO	1,280	1,250
TTFT (ms)	250	240
Tokens/sec	90	80
Multimodal	Yes	No
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	Yes	No

When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

Open-source model with strong performance
Very affordable via hosted providers
1M context window
Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

When to Use Qwen 2.5 Max

Choose Qwen 2.5 Max when you need: extremely competitive pricing, strong coding and general capabilities, open-source model available, good multilingual support including chinese. It excels at coding, general-purpose, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks.

Strengths:

Extremely competitive pricing
Strong coding and general capabilities
Open-source model available
Good multilingual support including Chinese

Best for:

codinggeneral-purposecost-sensitiveopen-source

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen 2.5 Max: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons