LV
LLMversus

Command R vs GPT-3.5 Turbo: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 8, 2026

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Command R and GPT-3.5 Turbo across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: April 8, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand RGPT-3.5 Turbo
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.150$0.500
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$1.50
Context Window
128K
16K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,140
1,120
Coding ELO
1,100
1,100
TTFT (ms)
250
150
Tokens/sec
85
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Command R

Command R excels at rag, chatbots, cost-sensitive, multilingual tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very affordable pricing
  • Good RAG and grounding capabilities
  • Strong multilingual support
  • 128K context window

Best for:

ragchatbotscost-sensitivemultilingual
When to Use GPT-3.5 Turbo

GPT-3.5 Turbo excels at cost-effective, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very cheap
  • Fast
  • Widely used

Best for:

cost-effectivegeneral-purpose

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Command RClaude Opus 4 vs GPT-3.5 TurboCommand R vs Gemini 2 5 ProGemini 2 5 Pro vs GPT-3.5 TurboCommand R vs O3GPT-3.5 Turbo vs O3Command R vs Deepseek R1Deepseek R1 vs GPT-3.5 TurboCommand R vs O1GPT-3.5 Turbo vs O1Command R vs Qwen 3 235bGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen 3 235bCommand R vs Gemini Exp 1206Gemini Exp 1206 vs GPT-3.5 TurboCommand R vs Gpt 4 5GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gpt 4 5Command R vs Groq Deepseek R1GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Groq Deepseek R1Command R vs Llama 4 MaverickGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Llama 4 Maverick