LLMversus

Command R vs GPT-3.5 Turbo: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Command R and GPT-3.5 Turbo across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand RGPT-3.5 Turbo
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.150$0.500
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$1.50
Context Window
128K
16K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,140
1,120
Coding ELO
1,100
1,100
TTFT (ms)
250
150
Tokens/sec
85
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Command R

Command R excels at rag, chatbots, cost-sensitive, multilingual tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very affordable pricing
  • Good RAG and grounding capabilities
  • Strong multilingual support
  • 128K context window

Best for:

ragchatbotscost-sensitivemultilingual
When to Use GPT-3.5 Turbo

GPT-3.5 Turbo excels at cost-effective, general-purpose tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very cheap
  • Fast
  • Widely used

Best for:

cost-effectivegeneral-purpose

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Command RClaude Opus 4 vs GPT-3.5 TurboClaude Sonnet 4 vs Command RClaude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-3.5 TurboCommand R vs Gemini 2 5 ProGemini 2 5 Pro vs GPT-3.5 TurboClaude Haiku 4 vs Command RClaude Haiku 4 vs GPT-3.5 TurboCommand R vs Deepseek R1Deepseek R1 vs GPT-3.5 TurboCommand R vs Qwen 2 5 MaxGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen 2 5 MaxCommand R vs Gemini 2 0 FlashGemini 2 0 Flash vs GPT-3.5 TurboCommand R vs Deepseek V3Deepseek V3 vs GPT-3.5 TurboCommand R vs O3 MiniGPT-3.5 Turbo vs O3 MiniCommand R vs O3GPT-3.5 Turbo vs O3