Command R vs GPT-4o Mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

GPT-4o Mini is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1200 vs 1100. GPT-4o Mini is faster at 120 tokens/sec vs 85 tokens/sec. GPT-4o Mini ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1220 vs 1140.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand RGPT-4o Mini
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.150$0.150
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$0.600
Context Window
128K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
16,384
Arena ELO
1,140
1,220
Coding ELO
1,100
1,200
TTFT (ms)
250
180
Tokens/sec
85
120
MultimodalNoYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoYes
When to Use Command R

Choose Command R when you need: very affordable pricing, good rag and grounding capabilities, strong multilingual support, 128k context window. It excels at rag, chatbots, cost-sensitive, multilingual tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very affordable pricing
  • Good RAG and grounding capabilities
  • Strong multilingual support
  • 128K context window

Best for:

ragchatbotscost-sensitivemultilingual
When to Use GPT-4o Mini

Choose GPT-4o Mini when you need: extremely affordable pricing, fast response times, strong for its price tier, good multimodal support. It excels at chatbots, lightweight-tasks, cost-sensitive tasks.

Strengths:

  • Extremely affordable pricing
  • Fast response times
  • Strong for its price tier
  • Good multimodal support

Best for:

chatbotslightweight-taskscost-sensitive

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons