LLMversus

Command R vs Grok 3-mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Grok 3 Mini is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1200 vs 1100. Grok 3 Mini ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1220 vs 1140.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand RGrok 3-mini
ProviderCoherexAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.150$0.300
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$0.500
Context Window
128K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,140
1,175
Coding ELO
1,100
1,190
TTFT (ms)
250
130
Tokens/sec
85
140
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Command R

Choose Command R when you need: very affordable pricing, good rag and grounding capabilities, strong multilingual support, 128k context window. It excels at rag, chatbots, cost-sensitive, multilingual tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two.

Strengths:

  • Very affordable pricing
  • Good RAG and grounding capabilities
  • Strong multilingual support
  • 128K context window

Best for:

ragchatbotscost-sensitivemultilingual
When to Use Grok 3-mini

Choose Grok 3 Mini when you need: very affordable pricing, fast response times, good for simple tasks, reasoning capabilities at low cost. It excels at chatbots, cost-sensitive, lightweight-tasks tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very cheap
  • Fast
  • Large context

Best for:

cost-effectivegeneral-purpose

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Grok 3-miniClaude Opus 4 vs Command RGemini 2 5 Pro vs Grok 3-miniCommand R vs Gemini 2 5 ProGrok 3-mini vs O3Command R vs O3Deepseek R1 vs Grok 3-miniCommand R vs Deepseek R1Grok 3-mini vs O1Command R vs O1Grok 3-mini vs Qwen 3 235bCommand R vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs Grok 3-miniCommand R vs Gemini Exp 1206Gpt 4 5 vs Grok 3-miniCommand R vs Gpt 4 5Grok 3-mini vs Groq Deepseek R1Command R vs Groq Deepseek R1Grok 3-mini vs Llama 4 MaverickCommand R vs Llama 4 Maverick