LV
LLMversus

Command R vs Llama 3.1 405B: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 8, 2026

⚡ Quick Answer

Compare Command R and Llama 3.1 405B across pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Updated: April 8, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand RLlama 3.1 405B
ProviderCohereMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.150$3.00
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$3.00
Context Window
128K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,140
1,240
Coding ELO
1,100
1,200
TTFT (ms)
250
150
Tokens/sec
85
100
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Command R

Command R excels at rag, chatbots, cost-sensitive, multilingual tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very affordable pricing
  • Good RAG and grounding capabilities
  • Strong multilingual support
  • 128K context window

Best for:

ragchatbotscost-sensitivemultilingual
When to Use Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B excels at general-purpose, reasoning, long-context tasks.

Strengths:

  • Largest open model
  • Excellent reasoning
  • High quality outputs

Best for:

general-purposereasoninglong-context

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4 vs Llama 3.1 405BClaude Opus 4 vs Command RGemini 2 5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 405BCommand R vs Gemini 2 5 ProLlama 3.1 405B vs O3Command R vs O3Deepseek R1 vs Llama 3.1 405BCommand R vs Deepseek R1Llama 3.1 405B vs O1Command R vs O1Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen 3 235bCommand R vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs Llama 3.1 405BCommand R vs Gemini Exp 1206Gpt 4 5 vs Llama 3.1 405BCommand R vs Gpt 4 5Groq Deepseek R1 vs Llama 3.1 405BCommand R vs Groq Deepseek R1Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 4 MaverickCommand R vs Llama 4 Maverick