Which is cheaper, Command R or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is cheaper for both input ($0.07/M tokens) and output ($0.14/M tokens), compared to Command R at $0.15/$0.60 per million tokens.

Which is faster, Command R or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is faster at 160 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 100ms, compared to Command R at 85 tokens/sec and 250ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, Command R or Phi-4?

Command R has a 128K token context window, which is larger Phi-4's 16K context window.

Which is better for coding, Command R or Phi-4?

Phi-4 has a higher coding ELO of 1130 compared to Command R's 1100, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

Command R vs Phi-4: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: Command R vs Phi-4 — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Phi-4 is significantly cheaper at $0.07/$0.14 per million tokens vs $0.15/$0.60. Phi-4 is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1130 vs 1100. Phi-4 is faster at 160 tokens/sec vs 85 tokens/sec. Command R offers a larger 128K context window vs 16K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Command R	Phi-4
Provider	Cohere	Microsoft
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.150	$0.065
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.600	$0.140
Context Window	128K	16.384K
Max Output Tokens	4,096	4,096
Arena ELO	1,140	1,150
Coding ELO	1,100	1,130
TTFT (ms)	250	100
Tokens/sec	85	160
Multimodal	No	No
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	No
Vision	No	No

When to Use Command R

Choose Command R when you need: very affordable pricing, good rag and grounding capabilities, strong multilingual support, 128k context window. It excels at rag, chatbots, cost-sensitive, multilingual tasks. Its 128K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

Very affordable pricing
Good RAG and grounding capabilities
Strong multilingual support
128K context window

Best for:

ragchatbotscost-sensitivemultilingual

When to Use Phi-4

Choose Phi-4 when you need: ultra-low cost for a capable model, strong math for its size (14b params), very fast inference, can run on consumer hardware. It excels at cost-sensitive, edge-deployment, math, lightweight-tasks tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two.

Strengths:

Ultra-low cost for a capable model
Strong math for its size (14B params)
Very fast inference
Can run on consumer hardware

Best for:

cost-sensitiveedge-deploymentmathlightweight-tasks

Command R vs Phi-4: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons