Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Grok 3?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper for both input ($0.10/M tokens) and output ($0.40/M tokens), compared to Grok 3 at $3.00/$15.00 per million tokens.

Which is faster, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Grok 3?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is faster at 160 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 120ms, compared to Grok 3 at 80 tokens/sec and 300ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Grok 3?

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1049K token context window, which is larger Grok 3's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Grok 3?

Grok 3 has a higher coding ELO of 1290 compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 1240, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Grok 3: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Grok 3 — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Gemini 2.0 Flash is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.40 per million tokens vs $3.00/$15.00. Grok 3 is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1290 vs 1240. Gemini 2.0 Flash is faster at 160 tokens/sec vs 80 tokens/sec. Grok 3 ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1300 vs 1260. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers a larger 1049K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Gemini 2.0 Flash	Grok 3
Provider	Google	xAI
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.100	$3.00
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.400	$15.00
Context Window	1.048576M	200K
Max Output Tokens	8,192	8,192
Arena ELO	1,260	1,285
Coding ELO	1,240	1,280
TTFT (ms)	120	200
Tokens/sec	160	90
Multimodal	Yes	No
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	Yes	No

When to Use Gemini 2.0 Flash

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash when you need: extremely fast inference, 1m context window at very low cost, strong multimodal support, great for real-time applications. It excels at chatbots, high-volume, cost-sensitive, multimodal tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

Extremely fast inference
1M context window at very low cost
Strong multimodal support
Great for real-time applications

Best for:

chatbotshigh-volumecost-sensitivemultimodal

When to Use Grok 3

Choose Grok 3 when you need: strong benchmark performance, good reasoning capabilities, vision and multimodal support, fast for its capability tier. It excels at general-purpose, reasoning, coding tasks.

Strengths:

Latest xAI model
Strong reasoning
Large context

Best for:

general-purposecodingreasoning

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Grok 3: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons