GPT-4.1 vs Mistral Large: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

GPT-4.1 is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1320 vs 1240. GPT-4.1 ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1245. GPT-4.1 offers a larger 1048K context window vs 128K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGPT-4.1Mistral Large
ProviderOpenAIMistral
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.00$0.500
Output Price / 1M tokens$8.00$1.50
Context Window1.047576M128K
Max Output Tokens32,7688,192
Arena ELO1,2901,245
Coding ELO1,3201,240
TTFT (ms)260280
Tokens/sec8875
MultimodalYesNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesNo
When to Use GPT-4.1

Choose GPT-4.1 when you need: 1m token context window, excellent coding performance, strong instruction following, competitive pricing for its capability. It excels at coding, long-context, agents, general-purpose tasks. Its 1048K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • 1M token context window
  • Excellent coding performance
  • Strong instruction following
  • Competitive pricing for its capability

Best for:

codinglong-contextagentsgeneral-purpose
When to Use Mistral Large

Choose Mistral Large when you need: strong multilingual support, good coding capabilities, european ai alternative, open-weight model available. It excels at coding, multilingual, general-purpose tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two.

Strengths:

  • Strong multilingual support
  • Good coding capabilities
  • European AI alternative
  • Open-weight model available

Best for:

codingmultilingualgeneral-purpose

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons