GPT-4o vs o4-mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)
⚡ Quick Answer
o4-mini is the better model for most tasks in 2026 -- it outranks GPT-4o on Arena ELO (1350 vs 1260), leads by a wide margin on coding (Coding ELO 1380 vs 1265), and costs 78% less ($1.10/$4.40 vs $2.50/$10.00 per million tokens). GPT-4o wins only on output speed (95 tok/s vs 60 tok/s) and multimodal breadth. The key question is not whether o4-mini is good enough, but whether you specifically need GPT-4o's real-time speed or native Code Interpreter in ChatGPT. For API use, o4-mini is the default choice.
Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | GPT-4o | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $2.50 | $1.10 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $10.00 | $4.40 |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | 16,384 | 32,768 |
| Arena ELO | 1,260 | 1,260 |
| Coding ELO | 1,265 | 1,270 |
| TTFT (ms) | 230 | 180 |
| Tokens/sec | 95 | 105 |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| JSON Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4oClaude Opus 4 vs o4-miniGemini 2 5 Pro vs GPT-4oGemini 2 5 Pro vs o4-miniGPT-4o vs O3O3 vs o4-miniDeepseek R1 vs GPT-4oDeepseek R1 vs o4-miniGPT-4o vs O1O1 vs o4-miniGPT-4o vs Qwen 3 235bo4-mini vs Qwen 3 235bGemini Exp 1206 vs GPT-4oGemini Exp 1206 vs o4-miniGpt 4 5 vs GPT-4oGpt 4 5 vs o4-miniGPT-4o vs Groq Deepseek R1Groq Deepseek R1 vs o4-miniGPT-4o vs Llama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Maverick vs o4-mini