Command R vs GPT-4 1.5-nano: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

GPT-4.1 Nano is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.40 per million tokens vs $0.15/$0.60. GPT-4.1 Nano is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1150 vs 1100. GPT-4.1 Nano is faster at 150 tokens/sec vs 85 tokens/sec. GPT-4.1 Nano ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1180 vs 1140. GPT-4.1 Nano offers a larger 1048K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand RGPT-4 1.5-nano
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.150$0.100
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$0.400
Context Window
128K
128K
Max Output Tokens
4,096
4,096
Arena ELO
1,140
1,150
Coding ELO
1,100
1,160
TTFT (ms)
250
120
Tokens/sec
85
150
MultimodalNoNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoNo
When to Use Command R

Choose Command R when you need: very affordable pricing, good rag and grounding capabilities, strong multilingual support, 128k context window. It excels at rag, chatbots, cost-sensitive, multilingual tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very affordable pricing
  • Good RAG and grounding capabilities
  • Strong multilingual support
  • 128K context window

Best for:

ragchatbotscost-sensitivemultilingual
When to Use GPT-4 1.5-nano

Choose GPT-4.1 Nano when you need: ultra-low pricing, 1m context window, very fast inference, ideal for simple tasks at scale. It excels at chatbots, classification, cost-sensitive, high-volume tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1048K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Super cheap
  • Very fast
  • Large context

Best for:

cost-effectivefast-inference

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons