Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for both input ($0.20/M tokens) and output ($0.60/M tokens), compared to DeepSeek V3 at $0.27/$1.10 per million tokens.

Which is faster, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is faster at 90 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 250ms, compared to DeepSeek V3 at 85 tokens/sec and 220ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick has a 1049K token context window, which is larger DeepSeek V3's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 4 Maverick?

DeepSeek V3 has a higher coding ELO of 1300 compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1280, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 4 Maverick — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Maverick is significantly cheaper at $0.20/$0.60 per million tokens vs $0.27/$1.10. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	DeepSeek V3	Llama 4 Maverick
Provider	DeepSeek	Meta
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.259	$0.150
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.420	$0.600
Context Window	128K	1.048576M
Max Output Tokens	8,192	32,768
Arena ELO	1,280	1,290
Coding ELO	1,300	1,280
TTFT (ms)	220	250
Tokens/sec	85	90
Multimodal	No	Yes
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	No	Yes

When to Use DeepSeek V3

Choose DeepSeek V3 when you need: excellent coding performance for its price, open-source and self-hostable, very competitive benchmarks, extremely affordable. It excels at coding, general-purpose, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks.

Strengths:

Excellent coding performance for its price
Open-source and self-hostable
Very competitive benchmarks
Extremely affordable

Best for:

codinggeneral-purposecost-sensitiveopen-source

When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

Open-source model with strong performance
Very affordable via hosted providers
1M context window
Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons