Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for both input ($0.10/M tokens) and output ($0.30/M tokens), compared to DeepSeek V3 at $0.27/$1.10 per million tokens.

Which is faster, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is faster at 110 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 200ms, compared to DeepSeek V3 at 85 tokens/sec and 220ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a 10486K token context window, which is larger DeepSeek V3's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek V3 has a higher coding ELO of 1300 compared to Llama 4 Scout's 1230, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 4 Scout — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.30 per million tokens vs $0.27/$1.10. DeepSeek V3 is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1300 vs 1230. DeepSeek V3 ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1280 vs 1250. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	DeepSeek V3	Llama 4 Scout
Provider	DeepSeek	Meta
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.259	$0.080
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.420	$0.300
Context Window	128K	10.48576M
Max Output Tokens	8,192	32,768
Arena ELO	1,280	1,250
Coding ELO	1,300	1,230
TTFT (ms)	220	200
Tokens/sec	85	110
Multimodal	No	Yes
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	No	Yes

When to Use DeepSeek V3

Choose DeepSeek V3 when you need: excellent coding performance for its price, open-source and self-hostable, very competitive benchmarks, extremely affordable. It excels at coding, general-purpose, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks.

Strengths:

Excellent coding performance for its price
Open-source and self-hostable
Very competitive benchmarks
Extremely affordable

Best for:

codinggeneral-purposecost-sensitiveopen-source

When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

10M token context window
Very affordable
Open-source and self-hostable
Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source

DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons