Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen 2.5 Max: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.30 per million tokens vs $0.16/$0.64. Llama 4 Scout is faster at 110 tokens/sec vs 80 tokens/sec. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 128K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 ScoutQwen 2.5 Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.080$0.160
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.300$0.640
Context Window10.48576M128K
Max Output Tokens32,7688,192
Arena ELO1,2501,260
Coding ELO1,2301,250
TTFT (ms)200240
Tokens/sec11080
MultimodalYesNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesNo
When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • 10M token context window
  • Very affordable
  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source
When to Use Qwen 2.5 Max

Choose Qwen 2.5 Max when you need: extremely competitive pricing, strong coding and general capabilities, open-source model available, good multilingual support including chinese. It excels at coding, general-purpose, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks.

Strengths:

  • Extremely competitive pricing
  • Strong coding and general capabilities
  • Open-source model available
  • Good multilingual support including Chinese

Best for:

codinggeneral-purposecost-sensitiveopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons