Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or o3-mini?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for both input ($0.20/M tokens) and output ($0.60/M tokens), compared to o3-mini at $1.10/$4.40 per million tokens.

Which is faster, Llama 4 Maverick or o3-mini?

Llama 4 Maverick is faster at 90 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 250ms, compared to o3-mini at 55 tokens/sec and 1500ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or o3-mini?

Llama 4 Maverick has a 1049K token context window, which is larger o3-mini's 200K context window.

Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Maverick or o3-mini?

o3-mini has a higher coding ELO of 1340 compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1280, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

Llama 4 Maverick vs o3-mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: Llama 4 Maverick vs o3-mini — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Maverick is significantly cheaper at $0.20/$0.60 per million tokens vs $1.10/$4.40. o3-mini is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1340 vs 1280. Llama 4 Maverick is faster at 90 tokens/sec vs 55 tokens/sec. o3-mini ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1310 vs 1290. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 200K.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Llama 4 Maverick	o3-mini
Provider	Meta	OpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.200	$1.10
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.696	$4.40
Context Window	1.048576M	128K
Max Output Tokens	32,768	65,536
Arena ELO	1,290	1,348
Coding ELO	1,280	1,348
TTFT (ms)	250	350
Tokens/sec	90	25
Multimodal	Yes	No
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	No
Vision	Yes	No

When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

Open-source model with strong performance
Very affordable via hosted providers
1M context window
Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

When to Use o3-mini

Choose o3-mini when you need: strong mathematical reasoning, good coding performance, affordable reasoning model, large output window. It excels at reasoning, math, coding, science tasks.

Strengths:

Strong reasoning
Good math skills
Affordable reasoning

Best for:

reasoningmathgeneral-purpose

Llama 4 Maverick vs o3-mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons