Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or o3-mini?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for both input ($0.10/M tokens) and output ($0.30/M tokens), compared to o3-mini at $1.10/$4.40 per million tokens.

Which is faster, Llama 4 Scout or o3-mini?

Llama 4 Scout is faster at 110 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 200ms, compared to o3-mini at 55 tokens/sec and 1500ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or o3-mini?

Llama 4 Scout has a 10486K token context window, which is larger o3-mini's 200K context window.

Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Scout or o3-mini?

o3-mini has a higher coding ELO of 1340 compared to Llama 4 Scout's 1230, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

Llama 4 Scout vs o3-mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: Llama 4 Scout vs o3-mini — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.30 per million tokens vs $1.10/$4.40. o3-mini is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1340 vs 1230. Llama 4 Scout is faster at 110 tokens/sec vs 55 tokens/sec. o3-mini ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1310 vs 1250. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 200K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Llama 4 Scout	o3-mini
Provider	Meta	OpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.080	$1.10
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.300	$4.40
Context Window	10.48576M	128K
Max Output Tokens	32,768	65,536
Arena ELO	1,250	1,280
Coding ELO	1,230	1,285
TTFT (ms)	200	350
Tokens/sec	110	25
Multimodal	Yes	No
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	No
Vision	Yes	No

When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

10M token context window
Very affordable
Open-source and self-hostable
Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source

When to Use o3-mini

Choose o3-mini when you need: strong mathematical reasoning, good coding performance, affordable reasoning model, large output window. It excels at reasoning, math, coding, science tasks.

Strengths:

Strong reasoning
Good math skills
Affordable reasoning

Best for:

reasoningmathgeneral-purpose

Llama 4 Scout vs o3-mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons