Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Maverick?

GPT-4o Mini is cheaper for both input ($0.15/M tokens) and output ($0.60/M tokens), compared to Llama 4 Maverick at $0.20/$0.60 per million tokens.

Which is faster, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Maverick?

GPT-4o Mini is faster at 120 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 180ms, compared to Llama 4 Maverick at 90 tokens/sec and 250ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick has a 1049K token context window, which is larger GPT-4o Mini's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick has a higher coding ELO of 1280 compared to GPT-4o Mini's 1200, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1200. GPT-4o Mini is faster at 120 tokens/sec vs 90 tokens/sec. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1220. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	GPT-4o Mini	Llama 4 Maverick
Provider	OpenAI	Meta
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.150	$0.150
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.600	$0.600
Context Window	128K	1.048576M
Max Output Tokens	16,384	32,768
Arena ELO	1,220	1,290
Coding ELO	1,200	1,280
TTFT (ms)	180	250
Tokens/sec	120	90
Multimodal	Yes	Yes
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	Yes	Yes

When to Use GPT-4o Mini

Choose GPT-4o Mini when you need: extremely affordable pricing, fast response times, strong for its price tier, good multimodal support. It excels at chatbots, lightweight-tasks, cost-sensitive tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two.

Strengths:

Extremely affordable pricing
Fast response times
Strong for its price tier
Good multimodal support

Best for:

chatbotslightweight-taskscost-sensitive

When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

Open-source model with strong performance
Very affordable via hosted providers
1M context window
Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons