GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.30 per million tokens vs $0.15/$0.60. Llama 4 Scout is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1230 vs 1200. Llama 4 Scout ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1250 vs 1220. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 128K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGPT-4o MiniLlama 4 Scout
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.150$0.080
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$0.300
Context Window128K10.48576M
Max Output Tokens16,38432,768
Arena ELO1,2201,250
Coding ELO1,2001,230
TTFT (ms)180200
Tokens/sec120110
MultimodalYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesYes
When to Use GPT-4o Mini

Choose GPT-4o Mini when you need: extremely affordable pricing, fast response times, strong for its price tier, good multimodal support. It excels at chatbots, lightweight-tasks, cost-sensitive tasks.

Strengths:

  • Extremely affordable pricing
  • Fast response times
  • Strong for its price tier
  • Good multimodal support

Best for:

chatbotslightweight-taskscost-sensitive
When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • 10M token context window
  • Very affordable
  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons