Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for both input ($0.10/M tokens) and output ($0.30/M tokens), compared to GPT-4o Mini at $0.15/$0.60 per million tokens.

Which is faster, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-4o Mini is faster at 120 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 180ms, compared to Llama 4 Scout at 110 tokens/sec and 200ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a 10486K token context window, which is larger GPT-4o Mini's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a higher coding ELO of 1230 compared to GPT-4o Mini's 1200, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Scout — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.30 per million tokens vs $0.15/$0.60. Llama 4 Scout is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1230 vs 1200. Llama 4 Scout ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1250 vs 1220. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 128K.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	GPT-4o Mini	Llama 4 Scout
Provider	OpenAI	Meta
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.150	$0.100
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.600	$0.300
Context Window	128K	10.48576M
Max Output Tokens	16,384	32,768
Arena ELO	1,098	1,250
Coding ELO	1,098	1,230
TTFT (ms)	180	200
Tokens/sec	120	110
Multimodal	Yes	Yes
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	Yes	Yes

When to Use GPT-4o Mini

Choose GPT-4o Mini when you need: extremely affordable pricing, fast response times, strong for its price tier, good multimodal support. It excels at chatbots, lightweight-tasks, cost-sensitive tasks.

Strengths:

Extremely affordable pricing
Fast response times
Strong for its price tier
Good multimodal support

Best for:

chatbotslightweight-taskscost-sensitive

When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

10M token context window
Very affordable
Open-source and self-hostable
Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source

GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons