Grok 3-mini vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1200. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1220. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGrok 3-miniLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderxAIMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.300$0.150
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.500$0.600
Context Window
128K
1.048576M
Max Output Tokens
4,096
32,768
Arena ELO
1,175
1,290
Coding ELO
1,190
1,280
TTFT (ms)
130
250
Tokens/sec
140
90
MultimodalNoYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoYes
When to Use Grok 3-mini

Choose Grok 3 Mini when you need: very affordable pricing, fast response times, good for simple tasks, reasoning capabilities at low cost. It excels at chatbots, cost-sensitive, lightweight-tasks tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very cheap
  • Fast
  • Large context

Best for:

cost-effectivegeneral-purpose
When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Open-source model with strong performance
  • Very affordable via hosted providers
  • 1M context window
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons