Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or o4-mini?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for both input ($0.10/M tokens) and output ($0.30/M tokens), compared to o4-mini at $1.10/$4.40 per million tokens.

Which is faster, Llama 4 Scout or o4-mini?

Llama 4 Scout is faster at 110 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 200ms, compared to o4-mini at 60 tokens/sec and 1200ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or o4-mini?

Llama 4 Scout has a 10486K token context window, which is larger o4-mini's 200K context window.

Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Scout or o4-mini?

o4-mini has a higher coding ELO of 1380 compared to Llama 4 Scout's 1230, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

Llama 4 Scout vs o4-mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: Llama 4 Scout vs o4-mini — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Sep 14, 2026By LLMversusUpdated September 17, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.30 per million tokens vs $1.10/$4.40. o4-mini is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1380 vs 1230. Llama 4 Scout is faster at 110 tokens/sec vs 60 tokens/sec. o4-mini ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1350 vs 1250. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 200K.

Updated: September 14, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Llama 4 Scout	o4-mini
Provider	Meta	OpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens	$0.100	$1.10
Output Price / 1M tokens	$0.300	$4.40
Context Window	10.48576M	128K
Max Output Tokens	32,768	32,768
Arena ELO	1,250	1,260
Coding ELO	1,230	1,270
TTFT (ms)	200	180
Tokens/sec	110	105
Multimodal	Yes	No
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	Yes	No

When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

10M token context window
Very affordable
Open-source and self-hostable
Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source

When to Use o4-mini

Choose o4-mini when you need: excellent reasoning and math capabilities, strong coding performance, affordable for a reasoning model, large output window. It excels at reasoning, math, coding, science tasks.

Strengths:

Affordable
Fast
Good reasoning

Best for:

general-purposereasoningcoding

Llama 4 Scout vs o4-mini: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons