GPT-4 1.5-nano vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Scout is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1230 vs 1150. GPT-4.1 Nano is faster at 150 tokens/sec vs 110 tokens/sec. Llama 4 Scout ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1250 vs 1180. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 1048K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGPT-4 1.5-nanoLlama 4 Scout
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.100$0.080
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.400$0.300
Context Window
128K
10.48576M
Max Output Tokens
4,096
32,768
Arena ELO
1,150
1,250
Coding ELO
1,160
1,230
TTFT (ms)
120
200
Tokens/sec
150
110
MultimodalNoYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoYes
When to Use GPT-4 1.5-nano

Choose GPT-4.1 Nano when you need: ultra-low pricing, 1m context window, very fast inference, ideal for simple tasks at scale. It excels at chatbots, classification, cost-sensitive, high-volume tasks.

Strengths:

  • Super cheap
  • Very fast
  • Large context

Best for:

cost-effectivefast-inference
When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • 10M token context window
  • Very affordable
  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons