Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for both input ($0.10/M tokens) and output ($0.30/M tokens), compared to GPT-4o at $2.50/$10.00 per million tokens.

Which is faster, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is faster at 110 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 200ms, compared to GPT-4o at 95 tokens/sec and 230ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a 10486K token context window, which is larger GPT-4o's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-4o has a higher coding ELO of 1265 compared to Llama 4 Scout's 1230, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.30 per million tokens vs $2.50/$10.00. GPT-4o is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1265 vs 1230. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	GPT-4o	Llama 4 Scout
Provider	OpenAI	Meta
Input Price / 1M tokens	$2.50	$0.080
Output Price / 1M tokens	$10.00	$0.300
Context Window	128K	10.48576M
Max Output Tokens	16,384	32,768
Arena ELO	1,260	1,250
Coding ELO	1,265	1,230
TTFT (ms)	230	200
Tokens/sec	95	110
Multimodal	Yes	Yes
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	Yes	Yes

When to Use GPT-4o

Choose GPT-4o when you need: fast response times, strong multimodal capabilities, code execution support. It excels at general-purpose, multimodal, function-calling tasks.

Strengths:

Fast response times
Strong multimodal capabilities
Code execution support

Best for:

general-purposemultimodalfunction-calling

When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

10M token context window
Very affordable
Open-source and self-hostable
Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source

GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons