Which is cheaper, Grok 3 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for both input ($0.20/M tokens) and output ($0.60/M tokens), compared to Grok 3 at $3.00/$15.00 per million tokens.

Which is faster, Grok 3 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is faster at 90 tokens/sec with a TTFT of 250ms, compared to Grok 3 at 80 tokens/sec and 300ms TTFT.

Which has a bigger context window, Grok 3 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick has a 1049K token context window, which is larger Grok 3's 128K context window.

Which is better for coding, Grok 3 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Grok 3 has a higher coding ELO of 1290 compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1280, making it the stronger choice for code generation and programming tasks.

Grok 3 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Name: Grok 3 vs Llama 4 Maverick — Pricing, Benchmarks & Speed Comparison 2026
Creator: LLMversus
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pricing verified Apr 20, 2026By LLMversusUpdated June 14, 2026View methodology

⚡ Quick Answer

Llama 4 Maverick is significantly cheaper at $0.20/$0.60 per million tokens vs $3.00/$15.00. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 128K.

Updated: April 20, 2026 · ✓ Pricing verified

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Grok 3	Llama 4 Maverick
Provider	xAI	Meta
Input Price / 1M tokens	$3.00	$0.150
Output Price / 1M tokens	$15.00	$0.600
Context Window	200K	1.048576M
Max Output Tokens	8,192	32,768
Arena ELO	1,285	1,290
Coding ELO	1,280	1,280
TTFT (ms)	200	250
Tokens/sec	90	90
Multimodal	No	Yes
JSON Mode	Yes	Yes
Function Calling	Yes	Yes
Vision	No	Yes

When to Use Grok 3

Choose Grok 3 when you need: strong benchmark performance, good reasoning capabilities, vision and multimodal support, fast for its capability tier. It excels at general-purpose, reasoning, coding tasks.

Strengths:

Latest xAI model
Strong reasoning
Large context

Best for:

general-purposecodingreasoning

When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

Open-source model with strong performance
Very affordable via hosted providers
1M context window
Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

Grok 3 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons